ADGUARD 6K THEREGISTER PLUS

They generally rely on unobtrusive ads that don't autoplay sounds, or move the page up and down, or use overlays, so I'm fine with visiting their site unblocked.

I use their site and consume their content and bandwidth, so I want them to remain in business and they deserve some compensation for my usage.

ADGUARD 6K THEREGISTER PLUS

What Adblock Plus is attempting to do is to find a middle ground that prevents intrusive ads or ads that otherwise interfere with your ability to view the website's content, but to still allow the site to gain ad revenue by encouraging them to use responsible, unobtrusive ads.Īs an example of following this principle, I have my adblocker disabled for the site. However, that isn't sustainable long-term, and will only result in them going out of business or switching to a pay model. You are in effect taking the stance that you are unwilling to pay for content, and you believe it is their responsibility to give you whatever you want absolutely free, and for them to pay out of their own pocket to give it to you if needed. Here is the the dill, pickle: if you want a website's content for free, they need revenue somehow to pay for providing the content. If anything, this is a reason to use Adblock Plus. I disagree completely, and in fact your perspective is harmful to the future of the internet.

Adguard 6k theregister